SubHub editorial standards
SubHub public guides are written to help readers define questions, compare scopes, and make safer planning decisions. They should be useful to people first, not created merely to attract search traffic.
Accuracy and scope
The SubHub editorial team uses plain language, separates general guidance from project-specific conclusions, and avoids invented prices, dates, credentials, locations, reviews, and marketplace availability. Cost pages explain relevant factors when reliable local pricing is not available.
Sources and product claims
Claims about SubHub features should match current product behavior. Technical, safety, permit, code, legal, and credential questions should direct readers to the applicable product instructions, qualified professional, issuing authority, or local jurisdiction rather than presenting a universal answer.
AI-assisted content
AI may assist drafting and organization, but published editorial content is the responsibility of the SubHub editorial team. AI output can be wrong and is not treated as professional expertise. Articles must not invent an individual author, biography, review, or firsthand experience.
Commercial separation and corrections
Paid membership or placement should not change factual editorial conclusions or be described as a credential. Material errors should be corrected when identified. Dates are shown only when a reliable publication or revision date is available; no date is added merely to imply freshness.